Outline Studies On The Rapture Question
By Ed F. Sanders
Chapter 2: Is Jesus Coming Before
The Tribulation?
The rapture of the saints and the resurrection of the righteous occur
at the "Coming of the Lord" (I Thess. 4:15, cp II Thess. 2:1). The
first and most obvious distinction of the pre-trib position is that
Jesus will come before the tribulation. The post-trib position requires
that "the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together
‘unto Him" (II Thess. 2:1) occur after a period of time described as
the tribulation. In order to answer with certainty the question this
chapter raises it is necessary to examine both the passages dealing
generally with the Lord's return and specifically with the rapture(1).
Concerning the time of the Lord's return:
1. Jesus taught that He would not come
until "immediately after the
tribulation" (Matt. 24:29,30, Mark 13:24-26). These important passages
occur in the great Olivet Discourse given by the Lord, in answer to the
disciples' specific questions concerning His return - and the events
surrounding it (cp. Matt. 24:3, Mark 13:4, Luke 21:7). Jesus' lengthy
discourse has been aptly called "The Apostolic Textbook on Prophecy"
(Matt. 24, Mark 13, Luke 21). Since this is the Lord Jesus' own
personal teaching and outline of future events, it must be the
criterion of all investigation into prophetic Scripture (cp. Rev.
19:10). An examination of a collation of Scriptures containing all that
Jesus taught concerning His return will prove conclusively that Jesus
never taught a pretrib rapture and coming(2). He taught only
a return
and gathering of His own after the tribulation. To this writer, this
point alone resolves the Rapture question. It is unthinkable that the
apostles - who wrote later - changed, contradicted, or supplanted the
teachings of Jesus! For as Christ's Church has historically taught: the
teachings of the O.T. Prophets were the preparation for the teaching of
Jesus, and the N.T. Apostles were the extension, but the Lord's own
personal teachings are the cornerstone or apex for the Church(3).
(Eph. 2:19,20, also Chapter 6, Intro.) .
2. The Apostle John wrote the book of Revelation, under divine
direction to the Church to guide it in future events (cp. 1:4, ch. 2-3,
22:16). Yet in Revelation there is no mention of a pre-trib coming of
the Lord: (See also Chapter 5.3). John portrays only one coming of the
Lord, after the tribulation. This one coming is personaI,
posttribulation, premillennial, glorious, victorious and the
vindication of the King of Kings and Lord of Lords (Rev. 1:4,
19:11-20:6).
3. The apostle Peter teaches the Church that Jesus will not leave
Heaven until He returns in victory, to set up His Kingdom (Acts
2:34,35,3:20,21). This same teaching is reflected in Heb. 10:12,13 (cp.
Ps. 110:1). These passages would be contradictory if the pre-trib
coming and rapture were taught elsewhere in Scripture.
4. Luke records a vivid picture of how the coming of the Lord will be
in Acts 1:6-11: it will be visible and personal (1:11) and will restore
the theocratic kingdom (cp. 1:6). According to the Lord's divinely
inspired messengers His next manifestation will be his glory-appearing,
not a secret rapture seven years earlier: Dr. Murray Harris in a course
on Acts at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (1972), related to me
how this passage alone exegetically demolishes the pre-trib case and
establishes beyond a doubt the next coming of the Lord will be
post-trib, pre-millennial.
Other references the posttrib return of the Lord will be cited in later
chapters but the above will suffice at this point. In view of the
Lord's teaching concerning the time of His return (which in fact was
continued - not changed by the Apostles), the crucial questions become:
1) Where in Scripture is it clearly
asserted that the Lord Jesus' teaching has been changed or supplanted?
2) What Scripture passage can be cited that states that Jesus will come
before the tribulation?
Advocates of pretribulationism should be able to answer these questions
with Scriptural propositions, not mere inference or conjecture. As one
popular pretrib author has said, "It is dangerous and wrong to found
any doctrine on implication without a single categorical statement in
the Bible"!(4)
A fundamental rule of Biblical interpretation (prophetic or otherwise)
is that you do not change clear direct statements of Scripture by
inference, conjecture or speculation(5). Jesus clearly
taught He was
only coming "after the tribulation" (Matt. 24:39, Mark 13:34, etc.).
Those that teach Jesus is coming before the tribulation do so on their
own authority, not that of God's word(6).
In1972 a Moody Bible Institute professor in response to my
question admitted that the pretrib coming was not taught in the Bible
"in so many words." If the theory is not taught "in so many words,"
then it should not be proclaimed as an established, infallible
doctrine, nor made a test of fellowship among believers.
Endnotes:
[1] Both pre, mid, and posttribs agree that the rapture and the
return of the Lord are different space-time events. The problem is the
time relationship and when they occur.
[2] See Zondervan Topical
Bible, pp. 575-576, 926. All serious Bible
students should have this book in their library: It is invaluable to
see all of the Scripture teaching printed out on almost every subject.
Taking into account the "whole counsel of God" on a given topic (such
as the Lord's Return) will guard against erroneous conclusions.
[3] See The Progress of
Doctrine in the N.T, T. D. Bernard (Pickering and Inglis)
[4] John R. Rice, The
Power
of Pentecost, (Sword Of The Lord
Publications), p. 226.
[5] Sound, consistent, grammatical-historical exegesis and
interpretation leads to historic posttrib, premillennialism. Cp. Ramm,
Protestant Biblical
Interpretation, (W. A. Wilde Publishers); also
Mickelsen, Interpreting the
Bible (Eerdmans).
[6] Latin has a proper phrase to describe "self-made statements
without any authority” and that is “ipse dixit’, a
favorite technique for those who cannot cite a clear Bible passage for
their teaching.
(c)1973, 2005